Legal Opinion

State Of Washington, V. Wendell Allen Wilson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 5, 2024No. 84551-9Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 84551-9-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION WENDELL ALLEN WILSON, Appellant. BIRK, J. — Wendell Wilson appeals his criminal conviction for shooting and killing Lila Wilson, asserting that during a police interrogation he unequivocally invoked his right to counsel under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602,

16 L. Ed. 2d 694

(1966). We conclude he did. Wilson stated, “I’m going to have to ask for legal representation”—words that courts have regularly found to constitute an unequivocal…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API