Legal Opinion

Bradstreet v. Crosbie

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 1926No. 17126Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

FOSTER, C.

An action was brought by the plaintiff in error, Delight Bradstreet, as plaintiff, in the district court of Tulsa county, to cancel a mortgage held by the defendant in error, J. E. Crosbie. upon certain real property located in the city of Tulsa. Subsequently, L. G. Bradstreet, the husband of Delight Bradstreet, intervened in' the action, also seeking the cancellation of the mortgage and' a promissory note which the mortgage purported to secure. An answer was filed by the* defendant in error, and also a cross-petition, wherein he sought judgment foreclosing said mortgage.

Tr…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Seager v. DraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Schroeder v. FinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Widger v. BaxterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. Citizens' Trust Co. v. McDougaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API