Bradstreet v. Crosbie
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
FOSTER, C.
An action was brought by the plaintiff in error, Delight Bradstreet, as plaintiff, in the district court of Tulsa county, to cancel a mortgage held by the defendant in error, J. E. Crosbie. upon certain real property located in the city of Tulsa. Subsequently, L. G. Bradstreet, the husband of Delight Bradstreet, intervened in' the action, also seeking the cancellation of the mortgage and' a promissory note which the mortgage purported to secure. An answer was filed by the* defendant in error, and also a cross-petition, wherein he sought judgment foreclosing said mortgage.
Tr…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schock v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Seager v. DraytonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Schroeder v. FinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
- Widger v. BaxterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Citizens' Trust Co. v. McDougaldTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.