Reap v. Dougher
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 164, Jan. T., 1917, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., June T., 1913, No. 108, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Mary Eeap, Thomas Dougherty, Thomas Euane, Mary Grace Enane and Hazel Euane, by their next friend and Guardian, ¿James Mullen, v. Catherine Dougher and Michael J. Dougher. Ejectment.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 164, Jan. T., 1917, by defendants, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., June T., 1913, No. 108, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Mary Eeap, Thomas Dougherty, Thomas Euane, Mary Grace Enane and Hazel Euane, by their next friend and Guardian, ¿James Mullen, v. Catherine Dougher and Michael J. Dougher. Ejectment. The facts appear from the following opinion by Terry, P. J., specially presiding, sur defendants motion for new trial: In this action of ejectment of the plaintiffs are Mary Eeap and Thomas Dougherty, children of Patrick Dougherty, deceased, and Mary Grace Euane and…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment in this case is affirmed on the opinion of the learned judge below, specially presiding, overruling defendants’ motion for a new trial.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Estate of GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Swieczkowski v. Sypniewski, Exr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Friedman v. SchoolmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Hanley v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Lieber v. EurichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.