State Ex Rel. Groce v. Martin
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
This appeal is from a decree dismissing a hill for mandamus to compel the county judge to issue to the county superintendent of education his warrant for the sum of $650 alleged to he due for salary. The indebtedness is denied, except $150' admitted to he due, and paid pending the suit, which amount the county judge answers, “he believes and is advised is all that is due the Relator.”
In the view we take, it is-unnecessary to set forth more in detail the disputed issues. If upon no other ground, the decree of the Chancellor must be affirmed because mandamus does not lie to compel the judge, or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Whitesides v. StuartTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Weaver v. AyersTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Waters v. STATE, EX REL., SCHMUTZERTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- State ex rel. D'Amore v. MeltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Motlow v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Reagan v. Fentress CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.