Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Groce v. Martin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1927PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This appeal is from a decree dismissing a hill for mandamus to compel the county judge to issue to the county superintendent of education his warrant for the sum of $650 alleged to he due for salary. The indebtedness is denied, except $150' admitted to he due, and paid pending the suit, which amount the county judge answers, “he believes and is advised is all that is due the Relator.”

In the view we take, it is-unnecessary to set forth more in detail the disputed issues. If upon no other ground, the decree of the Chancellor must be affirmed because mandamus does not lie to compel the judge, or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whitesides v. StuartTennessee Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Weaver v. AyersTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Waters v. STATE, EX REL., SCHMUTZERTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State ex rel. D'Amore v. MeltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State Ex Rel. Motlow v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Reagan v. Fentress CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API