Legal Opinion

Whitesides v. Stuart

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1892PublishedCited by 15 opinions

PROM HAMILTON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Hamilton County. John A. Moon, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLea, J.

This is a mandamus against the County Judge, and brought in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County by II. M. Stuart individually, without the intervention of the State, on relation of petitioner. The judgment was in favor of petitioner, and the County Judge appealed.

The petitioner claims to have been an overseer of a public road, and seeks to force the County Judge to draw his warrant for twenty-seven days’ work at $1 per day, and also for $28 for having furnished his own team to work the road. He gave no bond for costs, aud did not take the oath in forma pauperis, and swore to the petition…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Peerless Construction Co. v. BassTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  2. State ex rel. Weinberg v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Waters v. STATE, EX REL., SCHMUTZERTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hackett v. Smith CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  5. Meighan v. U.S. Sprint Communications Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API