Legal Opinion

City of Ottawa v. Brown

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1939No. 25428. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing

Ernest Brown was charged with violating an ordinance of the city of Ottawa which regulated and required a license for filling stations. He was found guilty by a justice of the peace, but on a trial de novo in the county court of LaSalle county a judgment of not guilty was rendered. The trial judge certified that the validity of a municipal ordinance is involved and that the public interest requires a direct appeal to this court. The city of Ottawa has perfected this appeal.

Section 65 of article 5 of the Cities and Villages act (Laws of 1872, p. 232; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939, chap. 24, par. 65.64)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kizer v. City of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Fligelman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. People Ex Rel. Lapice v. WolperIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Harmon v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Des Plaines v. GacsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Bulk Petroleum Corp. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Rasmussen v. Village of BensenvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Radcliff v. City of BerwynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. City of Monmouth v. LawsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API