City of Ottawa v. Brown
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Farthing
Ernest Brown was charged with violating an ordinance of the city of Ottawa which regulated and required a license for filling stations. He was found guilty by a justice of the peace, but on a trial de novo in the county court of LaSalle county a judgment of not guilty was rendered. The trial judge certified that the validity of a municipal ordinance is involved and that the public interest requires a direct appeal to this court. The city of Ottawa has perfected this appeal.
Section 65 of article 5 of the Cities and Villages act (Laws of 1872, p. 232; Ill. Rev. Stat. 1939, chap. 24, par. 65.64)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kizer v. City of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- Fligelman v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- People Ex Rel. Lapice v. WolperIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Harmon v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Des Plaines v. GacsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Bulk Petroleum Corp. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Rasmussen v. Village of BensenvilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Radcliff v. City of BerwynAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- City of Monmouth v. LawsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.