Legal Opinion
De Paolis v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerard M. Weisberg, J.
The question presented is whether a “Dole” cross claim for contribution* must be dismissed because of an admission in defense counsel’s opening statement exculpating a codefendant.
*308Plaintiff Edward De Paolis was a passenger in a motor vehicle owned and operated by defendants Rocco and Joseph Schirripa when it collided with a motor vehicle operated by defendant Josephine Prestianni at the intersection of Royce Street and Avenue X in the Borough of Brooklyn, New York. Plaintiff commenced this action for personal injuries predicated upon the negligence of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Bay Ridge Air Rights, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hoffman House v. . FooteNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Gilbert v. RothschildNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Goodman v. Brooklyn Hebrew Orphan AsylumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Devon Mobile Communications Liquidating Trust v. Adelphia Communications Corp. (In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005