Jerry Martin Co. v. Hyannis Marina, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
Under the procedure before July 1, 1974, the removal of a default rested in the sound discretion of the trial judge. G. L. c. 231, § 57, as then in effect. Rogers v. Ladd, 117 Mass. 334 (1875). Squier v. Barnes, 193 Mass. 21, 25 (1906). Hurnanen v. Gardner Automobile Co. 225 Mass. 189, 191 (1916). Cohen v. Industrial Bank & Trust Co. 274 Mass. 498, 500 (1931). The same is true under Mass. R.Civ.P. 55 (c), 365 Mass. 823 (1974). There is nothing in the record before us which demonstrates any abuse of that discretion in the denial of the defendants’ motion to remove the default. St. Martin v.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cohen v. Industrial Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Squier v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Hurnanen v. Gardner Automobile Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Rogers v. LaddMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- St. Martin v. SpinnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Greenleaf v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- New England Allbank for Savings v. RouleauMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Silkey v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- M. Clifton Edson & Son v. McConnellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Coady v. StackMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.