Legal Opinion

Hanrahan v. O'Toole

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 22, 1908PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from, Clinton District Court.— IIoN. J. W. BolliNgeb, Judge. PROCEEDINGS for probate of will. Verdict for proponent” and will admitted to probate. Contestants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J.—

The contestants, who are children of the deceased, contest the admission of his will to probate on the *231ground that said testator was mentally incompetent to make a valid disposition of his property, and that the instrument was procured by fraud, duress, and undue influence exercised by W. F. Hanrahan, the executor named therein, and by his wife and children. Other grounds are alleged, but those we have named are alone material for our consideration.

i. wills: mental capacity: evidence. I. At the close of the evidence, the trial court withdrew from the jury the issue of fraud and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Perkins v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Denning v. ButcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Post v. . MasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Meeker v. MeekerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. St. Leger's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Stormon v. WeissNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Graham v. CourtrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. In Re Estate of HellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Speer v. SpeerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API