United States v. Lamon
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Sentencing judges ordinarily "group" counts of conviction when they involve "substantially the same harm." U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2. In United States v. Sinclair, 770 F.3d 1148 (7th Cir. 2014), we ruled that when facing a particular combination of counts-the same combination in this case-a judge may not group them. Aaron Lamon pleaded guilty to three counts: (1) possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) ; (2) possessing a firearm in furtherance of that crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) ; and (3) possessing a firearm as a felon, id. § 922(g)(1). Following Sinclair , at…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Efrain Santos and Benedicto Diaz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Pierre BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Glenn Tate v. Showboat Marina Casino PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Clinton WatersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Royel PageCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Joseph WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Anycco RiversCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Seldrick CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Anycco RiversCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.