Legal Opinion

T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Willie Wilson, and P. J. Donovan, Deputy Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 3, 1964No. 20837_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment for plaintiff for the reasons for judgment set out in the district judge’s opinion. 1

Of the clear opinion that the district judge’s order should be affirmed, for the reasons that he gave, we approve his opinion and affirm his judgment. 2

Affirmed.

1. Wilson v. Donovan, Deputy Commissioner, etc., D.C., 218 F.Supp. 944.

2. See 15 Am.Jur. 387, See. 2; Restatement of the Law of Contracts, p. 498, Sec. 326; Aetna Cas. & Ins. Co. v. Jordan, 234 Ark. 339, 352 S.W.2d 75; Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. De Bruin, 271 Wis. 412, 73 N.W.2d 479;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scott v. DonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Patterson v. Sears-Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Hagenah v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Miller v. WellerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ingalls Shipbuilding Division, Litton Systems, Inc. v. HollinheadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Ingalls Shipbuilding Division v. Roy HollinheadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API