Legal Opinion

Cassidy v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1989No. 1940 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRUMLISH, Jr., President Judge.

The City of Pittsburgh’s Zoning Board of Adjustment (Board) denied Ronald and Marlene Cassidy’s (Cassidys) special exception request. The Allegheny County Common Pleas Court reversed. We reverse the trial court.

The Cassidys—owners of a detached, two-story home in a residentially zoned, single-family neighborhood—sought a special exception to convert their basement into a beauty shop.

The Board considered testimony from neighbors who supported the Cassidys’ request, and from the adjacent owners, who testified that the beauty shop would disrupt the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boreth v. Philadelphia Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Beecham Enterprises, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Page v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Abernathy v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Lower Allen Township v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goodman v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. DeLuca v. Zoning Hearing Board, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API