Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Holsman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 23, 1956No. Gen. No. 46,686PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE KILEY

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action under Section 37 of the Illinois Securities Act of 1919 as amended (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1951, Chap. 121%, Section 97 (1)) to recover an investment represented by a trust certificate allegedly sold in violation of the act. The issues were referred to a master in chancery who found for plaintiffs and recommended a decree in their favor. The chancellor approved the master’s report and entered a judgment, according to the recommendation, for $6,000 plus $1,500 attorneys’ fees. Defendants have appealed.

The Community Development General…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cerny-Pickas & Co. v. C. R. Jahn Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Commissioner of Banks v. Chase Securities Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Borrowdale v. SugarmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Weisbrod v. LowitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  5. Hammer v. SandersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Foreman v. HolsmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API