Legal Opinion

Tide Water Oil Sales Corporation v. Shimelman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 19, 1932PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The plaintiff and the defendants own adjoining tracts of land. The complaint contains two counts and the trial court gave judgment for the defendants upon the first count and for the plaintiff upon the second count, from which judgment both parties have appealed. The basis of the plaintiff’s claim for relief under the first count is that for a long time before the premises of either party were improved or built upon as they now are, the land of the plaintiff and other lands beyond were drained of surface water by means of an open drain or ditch running across the defendants’ property, but…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gillett v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  2. Adams v. WalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
  3. Shea v. GavittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  4. Robertson v. LewieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  5. Stein v. ColemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Saphir v. NeustadtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  2. Somers v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. O'CONNOR v. Dory CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  4. Ferri v. Pyramid Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  5. Taylor v. ContiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API