Legal Opinion

Howell v. Commercial Bank (Ocala Branch) a Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1906PublishedCited by 7 opinions

This case was decided by Division A. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.

The Commercial Bank exhibited its original bill against the above named appellants to enforce a lien upon five mules, basing its equity upon an “equitable mortgage” and a “purchase money lien.” A demurrer to the bill was sustained, with general leave to the complainant to amend its bill. In compliance with the leave so granted an amended bill was filed alleging a parol mortgage of the mules to secure the payment of money advanced to the purchasers thereof Howell & Bell and full knowledge of these facts to the Martel Lumber Company and the others named in the bill in whose possession the mules…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Webster v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
  2. Florida Land Rock Phosphate Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  3. Reese v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Malone v. MeresSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  2. Ray v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Davis v. HorneSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  4. Williams v. WetmoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  5. Banning v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API