Legal Opinion

Joplin v. University of Michigan Board of Regents

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1988No. Docket 97002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C.J.

Plaintiff filed a negligence malpractice action against defendants in Washtenaw Circuit Court. The lower court granted defendants’ motion for summary disposition on the ground of governmental immunity. Plaintiff appeals as of right only with regard to defendants Drescher and Hebert (hereinafter defendants). We affirm.

In her complaint, plaintiff alleged that on or about February 10, 1984, she entered the University of Michigan Hospital to have an abortion, that Drescher and Hebert worked at the hospital as doctors specializing in obstetrics and gynecology, that they terminated plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Canon v. ThumudoMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Tobias v. PhelpsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Davis v. LhimMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Green v. Berrien General Hospital Auxiliary, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. DeRocco v. Harper Grace HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Joplin v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Joplin v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API