Legal Opinion

United States v. Seek

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 2, 1982No. ACM S25499PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*947DECISION

HEMINGWAY, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the accused was found guilty by special court-martial of two specifications of willful damage to military property of the United States, in violation of Article 108, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 908.

In a single assigned error the accused contends the military judge erroneously denied a defense motion to dismiss the charge and its specification after the Government failed to produce a defense requested witness. We disagree. We are satisfied that, under the circumstances of this case, the judge did not abuse his discretion in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SweeneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  2. United States v. TangpuzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  3. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. DavisonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. MinayaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  2. United States v. BarretoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
  3. United States v. HarrisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API