United States v. Seek
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
*947DECISION
HEMINGWAY, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, the accused was found guilty by special court-martial of two specifications of willful damage to military property of the United States, in violation of Article 108, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 908.
In a single assigned error the accused contends the military judge erroneously denied a defense motion to dismiss the charge and its specification after the Government failed to produce a defense requested witness. We disagree. We are satisfied that, under the circumstances of this case, the judge did not abuse his discretion in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. SweeneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. TangpuzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. DavisonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. MinayaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. BarretoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001
- United States v. HarrisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987