Legal Opinion

State v. Nyhammer

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 3, 2009No. A-85 September Term 2007PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Albin

In this appeal, we first must determine whether the Fifth Amendment or our state-law privilege against self-incrimination compels the suppression of a statement by a person, who has voluntarily chosen to speak to the police after being fully advised of his Miranda rights, 1 solely because the police did not inform him that he was a suspect. The trial court ruled that, based on the totality of the circumstances, defendant John Nyhammer knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his Miranda rights, even though the police did not give him advance notice that the questioning would touch on…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. State v. S.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
  3. State v. W.B.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  4. State v. P.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  5. State v. A.M.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API