Legal Opinion

Serotkin v. Flavin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 5, 1959No. 58-312PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellants were plaintiffs in an action to foreclose a mortgage. They were the mortgagees and will be referred to as the lenders. The appellees were defendants and counterclaimants. They were the mortgagors and will be referred to as the borrowers. The lenders sought to enforce a lien for a balance of $325.89, upon an original loan of $1,000, plus interest and attorney’s fees. The borrowers pled usury and sought the return, pursuant to section 687.07, Fla.Stat., F.S.A., of all sums paid. The chancellor found that the actual principal sum ($657.40) received by the borrower…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chandler and Chandler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Jones, Et Vir v. Hammock Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Maule v. EckisSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  4. Sullivan v. Duval Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hardcastle v. MobleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  2. Putman v. PutmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Leviton v. Philly Steak-Out, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Stevenson Insurance Associates, Inc. v. CohenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API