Legal Opinion

Jones, Et Vir v. Hammock Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 4, 1937PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an appeal from a final decree cancelling a mortgage on the ground of usury. The Court held that the bonus and interest charged and paid amounted to more than 10 per cent., and that when such usurious interest was doubled and forfeited under the statute, it exceeded the principal sum loaned.

Prior to July 1, 1927, Appellees, Warren Hammock and Julia R. Hammock, his wife, through their agent, advertised for a $7,000.00 loan on certain property in Pinellas County, Florida, offering to pay a reasonable commission. In response to this application, appellants offered to make a loan to said…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Benson v. First Tr. Svgs. Bk., as TrusteeSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Chandler and Chandler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Clark v. GreySupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. United States v. BoydU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1890
  5. Sullivan Et Vir v. Thumm Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dixon v. SharpSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Shaffran v. HolnessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. HKL Realty Corporation v. KirtleySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. River Hills, Inc. v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Beekner, Et Vir v. L. P. Kaufman, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API