Legal Opinion

Bovine v. Selden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1909No. Docket No. 7PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Delta; Stone, J. Bill by Olivine Bovine against Sarah L. Selden, John M. Olson, and others, for the specific performance of a land contract, and to set aside a deed. Defendants Olson filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill to quiet title to land. From a decree dismissing the bill, and granting the prayer of the cross-bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an appeal from a decree in a chancery case. The questions involved were clearly stated by the trial court in a written opinion prepared by him, which reads in part as follows:

“I have such grave doubt of the equities of the complainant’s claim that I am constrained to dismiss her bill of complaint. Her husband had a land contract of a lot in the city of Escanaba, upon which a house was built, and there is no doubt that on April 14, A. D. 1906, the same was a homestead, and was the homestead of complainant’s husband and family, within the meaning of the *557Constitution and statutes of this…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stotts v. StottsMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Krueger v. GrothWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Phifer v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Hainz v. KurthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Vande Berg v. Vanden BoschMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API