Cecil Bank v. Heald
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeaj. from tbe Superior Court of Baltimore city. This was axa. action brought by tbe appellant against tbe appellees to recover the sum of $3,438.86 alleged to be tbe proceeds of certain promissory notes sent by them to Josiah Lee & Co., endorsed, “for collection,” which sum it was also alleged the said Lee & Co. had paid over, when collected, to the appellees, in payment of their own pre-existing debt. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of this Court.
Read the full summary
Appeaj. from tbe Superior Court of Baltimore city. This was axa. action brought by tbe appellant against tbe appellees to recover the sum of $3,438.86 alleged to be tbe proceeds of certain promissory notes sent by them to Josiah Lee & Co., endorsed, “for collection,” which sum it was also alleged the said Lee & Co. had paid over, when collected, to the appellees, in payment of their own pre-existing debt. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of this Court. The questions which have been passed upon by this Court en this appeal, arise upon exceptions taken by the plaintiff to the…
1Opinion of the CourtGoldsboeough, J.
The appellant instituted suit in the Superior Court of Baltimore city, to recover from the appellees the sum of $3,438.-85 alleged to be the proceeds of certain promissory notes sent to Josiah Lee & Co., specially endorsed “for collection.’ These notes were payable in Jersey city, New Jersey, and were transmitted by Lee & Co., to J. S. Fox, - Cashier, and endorsed “for collection.” They were collected by Fox, as Cashier of the Mechanics and Traders Bank of J ersey city, who, after deducting from the amount collected a balance due by Lee & Co. to said Bank, remitted the residue by check on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Davis v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bradshaw v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- De Forest v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897
- Blacher v. Nat. Bank of Balto.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Famous Shoe & Clothing Co. v. CrosswhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.