Legal Opinion
United States v. Brooks
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 27, 1995No. Civ. No. 94-483-STPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge:
The matters before the court are (1) intervenor’s request for reconsideration of Magis*603trate’s opinion and order regarding intervention (doe. #27), and (2) plaintiff’s objection to Magistrate’s order (doe. #28).
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS
On May 5,1994, plaintiff the United States of America (“United States”) filed this action against defendants James Patrick Brooks and Paul H. Casey, co-personal representatives (“PRs”) of the Estate of Henry J. Casey (“Estate”). The United States claims that it improperly issued a portion of an income tax refund to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Robert Blake v. Sant Pallan v. Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California, Plaintiff-In-Intervention/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Roy E. Merritt, Cross-Appellants v. The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Dixon L. Pyles and C. R. McRae Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- A. Farber & Partners Inc. v. GarberDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Columbia Gorge Audubon Society v. Klickitat CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Perles v. KagyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. GassmanDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. LannomDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.