Legal Opinion

Perles v. Kagy

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 27, 2005No. CIV.A. 01-0105PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

KAY, United States Magistrate Judge.

The issues currently before this Court arise out of two separate but related contract disputes over fees awarded to Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Perles (hereinafter “Perles”), and Perles’ partner and co-counsel, Thomas Fortune Fay (hereinafter “Fay”) based on their work in two wrongful death and state-sponsored terrorism lawsuits, Flatow v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 97-0396 (D.D.C.) and Eisenfeld and Duker v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 98-1945 (D.D.C.). The latest issue to present itself is Fay’s motion for reconsideration…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Roell v. WithrowSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Fund for Animals, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  5. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, Mike Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robert Ito Farm, Inc. v. County of MauiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API