Utica Mutual Insurance v. Monarch Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHufstedler, J.
Utica Mutual Insurance Company (“Utica”) filed a complaint against Monarch Insurance Company of Ohio (“Monarch”), George Woelke, George Woelke, Jr., and Angus McDonald, seeking a judgment declaring that Monarch’s policy of insurance upon Woelke’s Ford automobile, which Utica also insured, was in effect on July 8, 1962, the date of an accident out of which grew a pending action by McDonald against the Woelkes, and declaring that Monarch contribute to Utica half of Utica’s litigation expenses and half of the amount of any judgment or settlement for which Utica may become liable in the McDonald…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- In the Interest of L.R.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- LE Myers Co. v. Harbor Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Mission Insurance v. Guarantee InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.