Legal Opinion

Tulsa Torpedo Co. v. Kennedy

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 5, 1928No. 18199PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment refusing to vacate the appointment of a receiver.

The trial court, without notice, upon the petition of Kennedy and Weister, minority stockholders, which petition was verified only upon information and belief, appointed a receiver for the Tulsa Torpedo Company, a corporation. The petition did not allege insolvency as a ground for the appointment, and there was no allegation of an emergency so great as to warrant procedure without notice. The defendants below, Tulsa Torpedo Company, W. J. Donnell, W. B. Blair, and Gertrude Donnell, moved to vacate the order…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lyman v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Mead v. BurkIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Flesner v. CooperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  4. American Ass'n v. InnisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  5. Bentley v. TibbalsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anglo-American Royalties Corp. v. BrentnallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. United States Ex Rel. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
  3. Mitchell v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Lee v. Farmers Co-Operative Ass'n of Mountain ViewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API