Legal Opinion

Brandon v. Department of Corrections

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1993No. S-5140Published

1Opinion of the Court

865 P.2d 87 (1993)

Richard BRANDON, Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, State of Alaska, Appellee.

No. S-5140.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

December 17, 1993.

Richard Brandon, in pro. per.

John K. Bodick, Asst. Atty. Gen., Anchorage, and Charles E. Cole, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before MOORE, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, BURKE, MATTHEWS and COMPTON, JJ.

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

Richard Brandon was found guilty of violating prison regulations at a Cook Inlet Pretrial Facility (CIPT) disciplinary hearing. Brandon claims his right to due process of law was violated in the disciplinary hearing process.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Doe v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. McGinnis v. StevensAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Sandra J. Douglas, for Herself and as Representative of a Class v. Beneficial Finance Co. Of AnchorageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. Hayes v. CharneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API