Legal Opinion

Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The learned circuit judge concluded that at the time of the injury Thomas A. Bloxham was employed in interstate commerce, and that, consequently, the defendant commission had no jurisdiction to enter an award.

There is no dispute as to the facts. Plaintiff operates a railway system extending from the city of Superior, Wisconsin, through Minnesota to the Pacific coast. At the city of Superior it maintains, as an integral part of its system, an ore dock for the transfer, from its railway cars to vessels, of ore which is in transit from Minnesota mines, via the city of Superior, to other ports on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Sabine Tram Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Carson Petroleum Co. v. Vial, Sheriff & Tax CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Erie Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Kettner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API