Kettner v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, C. J.
On this appeal it is obvious that the findings of fact and conclusions of law and order made by the examiner and confirmed by the Industrial Commission of Wisconsin were fully warranted by the evidence in the record, and particularly the undisputed facts to the following effect: The business of the Great Northern Railway Company is almost entirely interstate transportation and Kettner was employed as its traveling freight agent, in calling on companies in Wisconsin and the upper peninsula of Michigan to induce them to ship or direct the shipment of freight over his employer’s railway in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- McCall v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Griffith v. GardnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Scarborough v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- George A. Straub v. Reading CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
- Bowers v. Wabash R. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952