Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Garvin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before Hudson, J., York, October, 1888. The opinion doubtless states the case sufficiently.1

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Simpson.

This was an action to foreclose a mortgage upon certain real estate, executed by the defendant, appellant, to the plaintiff, respondent, to secure the payment of a note for $100, given in the purchase of a mule by appellant from respondent. The mule was afterwards traded back to the respondent for a mare, the appellant agreeing to give $64 as boot, to secure which he executed a mortgage upon said mare. Afterwards appellant becoming dissatisfied because of the unsoundness of the mare, she was returned and the chattel mortgage…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ardmore v. GillamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. McWhorter v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  3. Blume v. WestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  4. McLaurin v. EddinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API