Legal Opinion

People v. Radley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Albert Radley was convicted of being a disorderly person, and sentenced to imprisonment for 90 days in the Detroit House of Correction, and to pay a fine of $100 . and costs.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

The respondent was convicted of being a disorderly person, in that he was, on the 5th of April, 1901, and for six weeks prior thereto, a drunkard. The offense was charged as a second offense. The case is before us for review on error.

The first assignment of error relates to the ruling of the circuit judge in holding that a question put to a juror on the voir dire was not proper. The examination was as follows:

‘ ‘ Mr. Turner (question of a juror): You say you have a prejudice against a man who drinks or gets intoxicated occasionally ?

“A. I don’t know what you might call it. I said I was not in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. SavageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Mack v. HandySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  3. Magahay v. MagahayMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Walton v. WaltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allred v. AllredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Ex Parte DryeMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API