Legal Opinion

Magahay v. Magahay

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1876PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from St. Clair Circuit. The court below dismissed the bill, and complainant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Cubiam:

We think the evidence in this case shows that the defendant has the habit of indulging in intoxicating liquors so firmly fixed that he becomes intoxicated as often as the temptation is presented by his being in the vicinity where liquors are sold. He either makes no vigorous effort to resist and overcome the habit, or his will has become so enfeebled by indulgence that resistance is impossible. We are therefore of opinion that he is, within the meaning of the divorce laws, an habitual drunkard.

The decree below will be reversed, and a decree entered in this court as prayed.

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Hilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Bizer v. BizerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  4. Johnson v. TorpyNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  5. McBee v. McBeeOregon Supreme Court · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API