Legal Opinion

McCloskey v. United Parcel Service General Services Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 3, 1997No. Civil No. 95-420-FRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, District Judge:

In these related actions, the plaintiffs, all package car drivers for United Parcel Service, allege that they have suffered repetitive stress injuries from using a handheld computer known as a delivery information acquisition device as part of their jobs. Before the court is the joint motion of the defendants for Rule 35(a) physical examinations of the plaintiffs (# 117).

CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES

There is no dispute that the defendants are entitled to arrange for Rule 35(a) physical examinations of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs, who live in many different states, are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Warren v. Weber & Heidenthaler, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. Southern Tire Mart, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  2. Carr v. IF&P Holding Company, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
  3. Carr v. IF&P Holding Company, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
  4. Lureen v. HollDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2017
  5. Robert G. Owens v. Donald W. Pugsley, et al.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API