McCloskey v. United Parcel Service General Services Co.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, District Judge:
In these related actions, the plaintiffs, all package car drivers for United Parcel Service, allege that they have suffered repetitive stress injuries from using a handheld computer known as a delivery information acquisition device as part of their jobs. Before the court is the joint motion of the defendants for Rule 35(a) physical examinations of the plaintiffs (# 117).
CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES
There is no dispute that the defendants are entitled to arrange for Rule 35(a) physical examinations of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs, who live in many different states, are…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Warren v. Weber & Heidenthaler, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1955
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ornelas v. Southern Tire Mart, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Carr v. IF&P Holding Company, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
- Carr v. IF&P Holding Company, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
- Lureen v. HollDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2017
- Robert G. Owens v. Donald W. Pugsley, et al.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.