Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brazan v. Washington

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 14, 2016No. 16-CA-61Published

1Dissent

LILJEBERG, J.,

dissents.with reasons.. hi have considered the opinion of the majority; Based on the clear and concise language of the policy, as well as controlling jurisprudence, I cannot agree.' I believe the trial court improperly granted the motions for summary judgment filed by plaintiffs, Peggy Brazan and Brookes Bra-zan Waguespack, and! deféndant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”). I further believe the trial court erred in finding the trailer is a “covered auto” under the nonowned autos provision of the insurance policy issued by defendant, Hallmark…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Jones v. Estate of SantiagoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  3. Sims v. Mulhearn Funeral Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  4. Bernard v. EllisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  5. Succession of Fannaly v. Lafayette Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API