Legal Opinion
United States v. Austin
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1972No. Nos. 72-1016 to 72-1019PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The above named defendants were tried and convicted on charges of securities fraud, contrary to 15 U.S.C. § 77q and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (aiding and abetting), and mail fraud, contrary to 18 U.S.C. § 2314 (2), 18 U.S.C, §§ 1341,1342 and 1343 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The appellants were jointly charged with numerous other individuals in an indictment which contained a total of 50 counts. Each of the four defendants was convicted on count 5 of the indictment, a securities fraud charge, arising under § 17 of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q. In addition, appellant…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- United States v. Harold v. Gleason, Paul Luftig and J. Michael CarterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Bobby StatenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,032 United States of America v. Edward Henry Ashdown and Charles E. Graham, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- People v. FigueroaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.