Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baldwin Realty Co. v. Interstate Trust & Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 27, 1931No. 30870Published

1DissentOverton, J.

I think it a matter of importance that it be decided whether the promissory note, executed by the Baldwin Realty Company, was negotiable or not. In my view, the negotiability of the note was destroyed by the clause found in the third paragraph reading: “Sub jeet to the terms of which said sprinkler contract this note is issued, secured, negotiated and held.” The effect of this clause is to attach to the promise to pay the conditions of a contract, such, for instance, as the fulfillment of the conditions of warranty, and all other conditions which there may be in the contract, thereby making…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Whitney-Central Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Klots Throwing Co. v. Manufacturers' Commercial Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  3. McComas v. HaasIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Dilley v. Van WieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Verner v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API