Legal Opinion

Zaid v. Boyd

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided September 28, 2022No. 6:22-cv-01089Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS GENE H. ZAID, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 22-1089-EFM JASON R. BOYD, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court are two motions. Defendant Jason R. Boyd’s moves to strike under the Kansas Public Speech Protection Act (“KPSPA”). In the alternative, he moves to dismiss Plaintiff Gene H. Zaid’s claim for defamation based on statements made by Boyd to others concerning certain formulas in the oil and gas industry under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, the Court grant Boyd’s Motion to Strike…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Ridge at Red Hawk, L.L.C. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API