Legal Opinion

Christ v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 10, 1923No. Gen. No. 7,583PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shurtleff

This was a suit brought upon a special accident and health policy issued by appellant to William H, Christ. The policy is set out in full in the declaration. It is a combination policy. The first part of the policy provides under certain circumstances for the payment of indemnities on account of accident; the second part of the policy provides for indemnities in the event of sickness. This suit is brought upon the first part of the policy, or for a claimed accident to the insured.

The facts in the case were submitted to the court without a jury on a stipulation of facts. There was no other…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  3. Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Healey v. Mutual Accident Ass'n of the NorthwestIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vollrath v. Central Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  2. Feigenbaum v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API