Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Missouri

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1990No. 88-1433Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

By order of this Court on August 3, 1989, appellees’ motion for attorney fees in *192this case was denied. Appellees have filed a timely petition for rehearing of that order with suggestion for rehearing en banc. The panel has carefully considered appel-lees’ petition for rehearing on the fees issue. We conclude that our August 3, 1989, order should not be disturbed, and therefore the petition for rehearing is denied.

Appellees brought a federal class action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the state of Missouri and various other defendants. The federal suit sought declaratory…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. CareySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Webb v. County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Stella STATHOS, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. Russell E. BOWDEN, Et Al., Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API