Legal Opinion

Cramer v. Conn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 11, 1964No. Appeal, No. 263PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

Plaintiffs sued in ejectment to obtain possession of certain land occupied by the defendant. In his answer, the defendant admits facts showing the superiority of plaintiffs’ title but asserts an equitable defence based on principles of restitution, asking that the suit be dismissed or that he be permitted to recover, either directly or through an equitable lien, be*4cause of improvements which he had made while in possession. Plaintiffs’ motion for judgment on the pleadings was granted hy the court below on the basis of the following facts averred by the plaintiffs and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. D. Graham & Co. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cercone v. CerconeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. United States v. 137.02 ACRES OF LAND, ETC., CMWLTH. OF PA.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Halgus Land Company v. HoltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Halgus Land Company v. HoltSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. In re LaBracio, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northumberland County1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API