Legal Opinion

Scott v. City of Niagara Falls

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph J. Sedita, J.

Defendant Niagara County has moved to dismiss this action for failure to state a cause of action.

In January of 1972, the plaintiff was convicted of the criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. In the fall of 1973, new evidence became available via a Grand Jury investigation. This evidence was favorable to the plaintiff. He learned of this new evidence through newspaper coverage of the investigation. Upon learning of this new evidence, he wrote to the Niagara County Judge seeking assistance in order to file a writ of error coram…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Zimmerman v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Jameison v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956
  5. Waterman v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tower v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Dziubak v. MottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Bradshaw v. JosephSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Tower v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Dwight Laughlin v. Dewayne Perry and Ellen FlottmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API