Hughes v. Argonaut Insurance Company
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, Acting P. J.
The doctrine of workers’ compensation exclusivity is a frequent subject of judicial tweaking. Like the law of search and seizure, the variety of fact patterns seems never ending, and each variation presents yet another opportunity for judicial review. This time we examine whether a claimant may sue her employer’s insurance carrier in superior court for what amounts to the insurer’s purported mishandling of its lien on the claimant’s settlement with a third party tortfeasor. We conclude she may not and accordingly affirm the judgment of dismissal.
I. Background
As…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Kraus v. Trinity Management Services, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- CHARLES J. VACANTI v. State Comp. Ins. FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Koszdin v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Paradiso v. TIPPS EQUIPMENTNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Mosby v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- California ex rel. TIG Insurance Co. v. CulpepperDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Leeds v. Reino & Iida CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2013