Legal Opinion

Vessels v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 31, 1996No. 08-95-00128-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHEW, Justice.

Christopher James Vessels appeals his jury conviction for capital murder. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 19.03.1 The state did not seek the death penalty, and the court assessed a life sentence in accordance with the statute. Vessels complains the trial court erred in admitting an unrecorded oral statement in violation of his constitutional and statutory rights. We affirm the judgment.

This case stems from the August 29, 1993 shooting death of Tony Dang, whose body was discovered in an East El Paso park. The same night, the appellant went to the county hospital for treatment for a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Dowthitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Hudson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. Almaguer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Anthony Ray Newsome v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  4. Anthony Ray Newsome v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008
  5. Anthony Ray Newsome v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API