Legal Opinion

James Wren v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1965No. 8222_1PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, by direct appeal, attacks his conviction of the offense of transporting a firearm in interstate commerce after having been previously convicted of a felony, under 15 U.S.C. § 902(e). After indictment and prior to trial, appellant filed a motion, under Rule 41(e), F.R. Crim.P., to suppress evidence and alleged the firearm he was accused of transporting was taken from him after an illegal search of his automobile. The trial judge held a hearing upon the motion, denied the same and sustained the search and seizure on two grounds. Because of our disposition of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. David W. Wion v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
  2. Paul C. Villano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  3. Robert Eugene Weed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  4. Robert Eugene McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  5. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. EspinosaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Richard Cleve BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  4. Paprskar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. United States v. BlalockDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API