Gorham v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Dissent
FICKLING, Associate Judge,
with whom KERN, Associate Judge, joins (dissenting) :
In my opinion the question squarely presented by these cases is whether the court below erred in refusing to accept appellants’ proffered test of criminal liability. Appellants contend that this court should recognize an affirmative defense based upon drug dependence to two crimes only, i. e., illegal possession of heroin, D.C.Code 1973, § 33-402(a), and possession of implements of crime (narcotic paraphernalia), D.C.Code 1973, § 22-3601 (hereinafter, PIC). Rather than considering appellants’ contention in the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.