Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Detention of Anderson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2009No. 79111-2Published

1DissentSanders, J.

¶21 (dissenting) — I agree with our majority and the Court of Appeals that the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to appoint Dr. Richard Wollert as John Anderson’s expert witness and thus denied Anderson the services of a trial expert to rebut the State’s evidence. I disagree, however, that the acts relied upon by the State could constitute recent overt acts. Therefore I would reverse and dismiss.

I. Facts and Procedural History

¶22 In 1988 Anderson pleaded guilty to first degree statutory rape of a two-and-one-half-year-old boy. Anderson *553was 17 years old. He was sentenced to a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API