United States v. Hall
United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPecinovsky, Judge
I concur that the military judge erred in refusing to admit the testimony of A1C Gilbert concerning whether SrA Stachum asked appellant to provide him with steroids. A1C Gilbert would have testified that he overheard SrA Stachum ask appellant if he could “hook him up.” Such testimony should have been admitted to impeach the testimony of SrA Stachum that he never asked appellant to provide him with steroids.
In addition, A1C Gilbert should have been permitted to testify that appellant complained to A1C Gilbert that SrA Stachum kept bugging appellant about obtaining steroids. A1C Gilbert’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. Leonard Watson A/K/A 'Step'Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. CollierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.