Legal Opinion

Mattox v. DeLoach

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1924No. 15328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. “Under the law of processioning as it exists in this State, established lines and not new ones are to be fixed and determined; the location of I-ines, not as they ought to be, but as they actually exist, is to be sought.” Boyce v. Cook, 140 Ga. 360 (78 S. E. 1057); Bowen v. Jackson, 101 Ga. 817 (29 S. E. 40); Wheeler v. Thomas, 139 Ga. 598 (77 S. E. 817); Amos v. Parker, 88 Ga. 754 (16 S. E. 200); Cranford v. Wheeler, 111 Ga. 870 (36 S. E. 954); Walker v. Boyer, 121 Ga. 300 (48 S. E. 916); Cosby v. Reid, 21 Ga. App. 604 (94 S. E. 824); Elkins v. Merritt, 20 Ga. App. 737 (93 S. E. 236);…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Osteen v. WynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  2. Amos v. ParkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Bowen v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Cosby v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  5. O'Neal v. WardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  2. Ingram & LeGrand Lumber Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Welch v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API