Holt v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of the petitions for review and briefs in these legislative redistricting appeals, and after entertaining oral argument on January 23, 2012, this Court finds that the final 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Plan is contrary to law. Pa. Const, art. II, § 17(d).1 Accordingly, the final 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Plan is REMANDED to the 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission with a directive to reapportion the Com*716monwealth in a manner consistent with this Court’s Opinion, which will follow. Id.
The 2001 Legislative…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Albert v. 2001 Legislative Reapportionment CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
4Cited by37 opinions
- Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- League of Women Voters of PA v. CmwlthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.