Legal Opinion

Holt v. 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 2012PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of the petitions for review and briefs in these legislative redistricting appeals, and after entertaining oral argument on January 23, 2012, this Court finds that the final 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Plan is contrary to law. Pa. Const, art. II, § 17(d).1 Accordingly, the final 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Plan is REMANDED to the 2011 Legislative Reapportionment Commission with a directive to reapportion the Com*716monwealth in a manner consistent with this Court’s Opinion, which will follow. Id.

The 2001 Legislative…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Albert v. 2001 Legislative Reapportionment CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

4Cited by37 opinions

  1. Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. League of Women Voters of PA v. CmwlthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API