Legal Opinion

Albert Einstein Medical Center v. National Benefit Fund for Hospital & Health Care Employees

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-5931PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

VANARTSDALEN, Senior District Judge.

On September 29, 1989, in a Memorandum Opinion and Order, I dismissed plaintiffs’ claims for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Upon reconsideration of my previous decision, I now hold that federal subject matter jurisdiction does exist over plaintiffs’ complaint. I will therefore also address the merits of defendant’s earlier motion to dismiss the complaint because it is preempted by ERISA and because plaintiffs fail to state a complaint upon which relief can be granted under ERISA. For the reasons discussed herein,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Chiropractic Nutritional Associates, Inc. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue ShieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Allergy Diagnostics Laboratory v. EquitableDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Application of Prudential Securities Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  4. Bryn Mawr Hospital v. Coatesville Electric Supply Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Foley v. Southwest Texas HMO, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API