Albert Einstein Medical Center v. National Benefit Fund for Hospital & Health Care Employees
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
VANARTSDALEN, Senior District Judge.
On September 29, 1989, in a Memorandum Opinion and Order, I dismissed plaintiffs’ claims for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Upon reconsideration of my previous decision, I now hold that federal subject matter jurisdiction does exist over plaintiffs’ complaint. I will therefore also address the merits of defendant’s earlier motion to dismiss the complaint because it is preempted by ERISA and because plaintiffs fail to state a complaint upon which relief can be granted under ERISA. For the reasons discussed herein,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Chiropractic Nutritional Associates, Inc. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue ShieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Allergy Diagnostics Laboratory v. EquitableDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Application of Prudential Securities Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Bryn Mawr Hospital v. Coatesville Electric Supply Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Foley v. Southwest Texas HMO, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.